Skip to content
Celeus

Descriptive table (Table 1)

Shown in the app as table_one_full. Part of the method reference, under Descriptive.

When to use

Describe the whole dataset: every variable summarised on its own terms (median [Q1, Q3] or mean (SD), chosen per variable), counts with confidence intervals for proportions, and a missingness row - optionally split by one grouping variable. No hypothesis is tested.

What you provide

  • Group (optional): one categorical column.

Options

Missing data

  • Complete case (listwise deletion)

Multiple comparisons

  • Holm
  • Benjamini-Hochberg (false discovery rate)
  • Bonferroni
  • None (unadjusted)

Worked example

Celeus's result on a published or illustrative dataset, next to an independent computation and, where one exists, a published value. The data themselves are not reproduced here.

datasets::ToothGrowth

  • Source: Published dataset distributed with an R package
  • Licence: base R (GPL)
  • Reference: Crampton (1947), J. Nutrition 33(5)
QuantityCeleusIndependent computationPublished valueAgrees
Number of observations6060-Yes
Number of variables summarised22-Yes

Validation report

References

  1. Wilson, E. B. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association 22: 209-212. doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953 doi:10.1080/01621459.1927.10502953
  2. Newcombe, R. G. (1998). Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Statistics in Medicine 17: 857-872. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>3.0.CO;2-E doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<857::AID-SIM777>3.0.CO;2-E
  3. Shapiro, S. S., Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52: 591-611. doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591 doi:10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591